data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4d1fa/4d1fa521a80e96cd03fcc03fe7181ccbff2efc01" alt=""
Wednesday, September 29, 2010
Tahko on Aristotelian metaphysics
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4d1fa/4d1fa521a80e96cd03fcc03fe7181ccbff2efc01" alt=""
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
"One of the best contemporary writers on philosophy" National Review
"A terrific writer" Damian Thompson, Daily Telegraph
"Feser... has the rare and enviable gift of making philosophical argument compulsively readable" Sir Anthony Kenny, Times Literary Supplement
Selected for the First Things list of the 50 Best Blogs of 2010 (November 19, 2010)
Thanks for the publicity Ed! I hope to be able to post a table of contents soon.
ReplyDeleteI am so looking forward to reading this paper!
ReplyDeleteI enjoyed reading Dr. Tahko's paper - especially the critique of Ladyman and Ross (I think there should be more such critiques). The marking of a distinction between metaphysics and conceptual analysis reminded me of some of the excellent work that Stanley Rosen has done (especially in his book, The Limits of Analysis). Have either Dr. Feser or Dr. Tahko read it, or part of it? If so, opinions?
ReplyDeleteMy pleasure, Tuomas! BTW, I just added the snapshot above to help make sure that no one misses seeing this post, given the (long-ish) next post on classical theism I'll be putting up shortly. Plus, everyone should see what a serious beard looks like. (I will spare the reader any snaps of the pathetic stubble beard I've been sporting of late.)
ReplyDeleteAnon,
I'm aware of Rosen's book, but I'm afraid I haven't read it. Someday, though.
Anon,
ReplyDeleteUnfortunately I haven't read Rosen's book either, but I hope to have a chance to do so. Thanks for the pointer!