In these words our Lord forbids rash judgment which is about the inward intention, or other uncertain things, as Augustine states… Or again according to Chrysostom, He forbids the judgment which proceeds not from benevolence but from bitterness of heart. (Summa Theologiae )
Sunday, September 18, 2022
On the podcast Mind Chat, philosophers Philip Goff and Keith Frankish discuss the philosophical problem of consciousness with Noam Chomsky. Goff is a proponent of panpsychism and Frankish of illusionism, where Goff characterizes these, respectively, as the view that consciousness is everywhere and the view that consciousness is nowhere. (This might be a bit of an overstatement in the case of Frankish’s position, given what he says during the podcast.) Chomsky’s own position is not easy to capture in a simple label, but I think that it can, to a first approximation, be described as a kind of modest naturalism. The discussion is very interesting, and what follows is a summary with some comments of my own.
Monday, September 12, 2022
Friday, September 9, 2022
All One in Christ: A Catholic Critique of Racism and Critical Race Theory: A print interview conducted by Carl Olson appears today at Catholic World Report. A few days ago I did a radio interview about the book for The Drew Mariani Show. And the book was one of the topics covered in my recent interview for Thomas Mirus’s Catholic Culture podcast.
Tuesday, September 6, 2022
Monday, September 5, 2022
Catholic Culture podcast. The discussion was pretty wide ranging, covering topics as diverse as libertarianism, the aesthetics of the music of Thelonious Monk, and Critical Race Theory. You can watch the interview at YouTube or at the Catholic Culture website.
Friday, September 2, 2022
my main website. The title is “Socialism versus the Family,” and I presented it at the Heritage Foundation back in February of 2019. The talk begins by explaining the economics and ethos of socialism, and how socialism is related to liberalism. It then explains the nature of the family, emphasizing the features recognized by natural law theorists and evolutionary psychology alike. Finally it shows how egalitarian socialism is inherently incompatible with the family, but also how the liberal individualism embraced by too many modern conservatives is precisely what paved the way for the egalitarian assault on the family. You can watch the video of the lecture here.