Natural theology is traditionally distinguished from revealed theology. Natural theology is concerned with knowledge about God’s existence and nature that is available to us via the use of our natural cognitive faculties, such as by way of philosophical arguments. It does not require an appeal to any special divine revelation, whether embodied in scripture, the teachings of a prophet backed by miracles, or what have you. There might happen to be teachings in some source of special divine revelation that overlap with the deliverances of natural theology, but what makes something a matter of natural theology is that it can at least in principle be known apart from that.
Friday, January 31, 2020
Thursday, January 23, 2020
Adventures in the Old Atheism, Part IV: Marx
I have never been remotely attracted to Marxism. Its economic reductionism, vision of human life as a struggle of antagonistic classes, hostility to the family, and the hermeneutics of suspicion enshrined in its theory of ideology, are all repulsive and inhuman. Other elements, such as the theory of surplus value and prophecies about the withering away of the state and the idyll of life under communism, are sheer tosh. These flaws are grave and real whatever one thinks about capitalism. Indeed, opposition to Marxism is in my view a prerequisite to being a serious critic of capitalism, for Marxism contains none of the good that is in capitalism, much of the bad that is in it, and adds grave evils of its own to boot.
Posted by Edward Feser at 6:35 PM 171 comments:
Tuesday, January 21, 2020
The Thomistic Institute has added to the great work it is already doing by introducing Aquinas 101, “a series of free video courses… that help you to engage life’s most urgent philosophical and theological questions with the wisdom of St. Thomas Aquinas.” Here are four brief and lucid examples: Fr. Dominic Legge on the problem of evil, Fr. James Brent on the principle of non-contradiction, Fr. Thomas Joseph White on the abiding relevance of Aquinas, and Fr. Gregory Maria Pine on how to read the Summa Theologiae. Check them out and enroll today!
Posted by Edward Feser at 12:46 PM 49 comments:
Monday, January 20, 2020
Upcoming talks, etc.
On February 6 on Cameron Bertuzzi’s Capturing Christianity, Graham Oppy and I will resume the debate on the existence of God that we began last July.
On February 11, I will be giving a talk at Cornell University on the topic “What is Matter?” The event is being hosted by the Thomistic Institute and will be at 6:30 pm in the Physical Science Building, Room 120.
On February 19, I will be giving a talk at UCLA on the same topic. This event too is being hosted by the Thomistic Institute. Keep an eye on the Thomistic Institute website for further details.
Posted by Edward Feser at 10:25 AM 32 comments:
Wednesday, January 15, 2020
Johnson on Aristotle’s Revenge
At Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews, Monte Ransome Johnson reviews my book Aristotle’s Revenge. Prof. Johnson is an Aristotle scholar and historian of philosophy, which is relevant to understanding his review. He says some nice things about the book, singling out my discussion of Aristotle and computationalism as “interesting” and writing:
Feser's book could be useful to those interested in defending anti-reductionist positions in various disputes in philosophy of science… Feser's impressive grasp of this anti-reductionist literature makes him a formidable polemicist, able to sift the avalanche of philosophy of science literature and find the concepts he is looking for.
Posted by Edward Feser at 11:56 AM 40 comments:
Sunday, January 12, 2020
The Guardian reports that conservative philosopher Sir Roger Scruton has died. I vividly recall the first time I became aware of Scruton. I was an undergraduate philosophy major in the late 1980s, and a professor had posted on the bulletin board near his office an article about Scruton, on which he’d scrawled the words: “Mrs. Thatcher’s favorite philosopher.” It was not intended as a compliment. But since I was a conservative as well as an aspiring philosopher, it attracted rather than repelled me. During the many hours I spent in bookstores in those days, seeing Scruton’s name on the spine of a book became a reason instantly to pull it off the shelf and take a look. And actually reading Scruton soon gave reason to seek out everything else he’d written. Which, as every Scruton admirer knows, could become a full time job.
Posted by Edward Feser at 11:04 PM 19 comments:
Saturday, January 11, 2020
Review of Swinburne
My review of Richard Swinburne’s recent book Are We Bodies or Souls? appears in the February 2020 issue of First Things. You can read it online.
Posted by Edward Feser at 10:09 AM 205 comments:
Thursday, January 9, 2020
The rationalist/empiricist false choice
I’ve often argued that contemporary philosophers too often think only within the box of alternative positions inherited from their early modern forebears, neglecting or even being ignorant of the very different ways that pre-modern philosophers would carve up the conceptual territory. One of the chief ways this is so has to do with the rationalist/empiricist dichotomy, as filtered through Kant. It has hobbled clear thinking not only about epistemology, but also about metaphysics.
Posted by Edward Feser at 3:04 PM 59 comments:
Friday, January 3, 2020
Links for a new year
Joseph Bessette on criminal sentencing laws and retributive justice, at Public Discourse.
The Catholic Thing on the late, great Michael Uhlmann. Requiescat in pace, Mike.
At The New Atlantis, Benjamin Liebeskind reviews Neo-Aristotelian Perspectives on Contemporary Science.
At The Spectator, Roger Scruton looks back with gratitude at an annus horribilis.
Jez Rowden’s Steely Dan: Every Album, Every Song will be released next month. Ultimate Classic Rock on the great Eagles/Steely Dan cross-reference.
Posted by Edward Feser at 6:56 PM 83 comments:
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)