Honestly,
what runs through editors’ minds when they assign book reviewers? The Claremont
Review of Books has just run a
review of Aristotle’s
Revenge, by some fellow named J. Eric Wise. And, heaven help us, it’s Glenn
Ellmers’ review redivivus.
Anyone who
has read my book will be keen to learn what a reviewer might say about my views
on topics like: embodied cognition and embodied perception; epistemic
structural realism; causal powers and laws of nature; the A- and B-theories of
time; presentism; reductionism in chemistry; primary versus secondary
qualities; computational notions in natural science; biological reductionism;
evolution and essentialism; neuroscientific reductionism; and so on. You know, the stuff I actually discuss in the
book.