Friday, April 19, 2024
Daniel Dennett (1942-2024)
Prominent
philosopher of mind, apostle of Darwinism, and New Atheist writer Daniel
Dennett has
died. I have been very critical of
Dennett over the years, but he had two great strengths. First, he wrote with crystal clarity, no
matter how difficult the subject matter. Second, as even we critics of materialism can
happily concede, he could be very insightful on the distinctive nature of
psychological modes of description and explanation (even if he went wrong when addressing
how these relate metaphysically to physical modes of description and
explanation). It is also only fair to
acknowledge that of the four original New Atheist tomes (the others penned by
Dawkins, Harris, and Hitchens) his Breaking
the Spell, despite its faults, was the one that was actually intellectually
interesting. RIP
Saturday, April 13, 2024
Mansini on the development of doctrine
My review of Guy Mansini’s excellent new book The
Development of Dogma: A Systematic Account appears in the May 2024 issue of First Things.
Thursday, April 11, 2024
Two problems with Dignitas Infinita
This week
the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith (DDF) published the Declaration Dignitas
Infinita, on the topic of human dignity. I am as weary as anyone of the circumstance
that it has now become common for new documents issued by the Vatican to be met
with fault-finding. But if the faults
really are there, then we oughtn’t to blame the messenger. And this latest document exhibits two serious
problems: one with its basic premise, and the other with some of the
conclusions it draws from it.
Wednesday, April 10, 2024
Western civilization's immunodeficiency disease
Liberalism
is to the social order what AIDS is to the body. By relegating the truths of natural law and
divine revelation to the private sphere, it destroys the immune system of the
body politic, opening the way to that body’s being ravaged by moral decay and
ideological fanaticism. I develop this
theme in a
new essay over at Postliberal Order.
Tuesday, April 2, 2024
Ed Piskor (1982-2024)
This week, cartoonist
Ed Piskor committed suicide in the wake of the relentless online pillorying and
overnight destruction of his career that followed upon allegations of sexual misconduct,
of which he insisted he was innocent. Piskor’s work was not really to my taste,
but I often enjoyed the Cartoonist
Kayfabe YouTube channel he co-hosted. I was always impressed by the manifest
love, respect, and appreciation he showed for the great comic book artists of
the past. These are attractive and admirable attitudes to take toward those
from whom one has learned.
The illusion of AI
My essay “The
Illusion of Artificial Intelligence” appears in the
latest issue of the Word on Fire Institute’s journal Evangelization & Culture.
Friday, March 29, 2024
Wishful thinking about Judas
In a recent
article at Catholic Answers titled “Hope
for Judas?” Jimmy Akin tells us that though he used to find
convincing the traditional view that Judas is damned, it now seems to him that “we
don’t have conclusive proof that
Judas is in hell, and there is still a ray of hope for him.” But there is a difference between hope and
wishful thinking. And with all due
respect for Akin, it seems to me that given the evidence, the view that Judas
may have been saved crosses the line from the former to the latter.
Jesuit Britain?
Did Spanish
Scholastic thinkers influence British liberalism? You
can now access my Religion and
Liberty review of Projections
of Spanish Jesuit Scholasticism on British Thought: New Horizons in Politics,
Law, and Rights, edited by Leopoldo J. Prieto López and José Luis
Cendejas Bueno.
Monday, March 25, 2024
Mind, matter, and malleability
Continuing our
look at Jacques Maritain’s Three
Reformers: Luther, Descartes, Rousseau, let’s consider some arresting
passages on the conception of human nature the modern world has inherited from
Descartes. Maritain subtitles his
chapter on the subject “The Incarnation of the Angel.” As you might expect, this has in part to do
with the Cartesian dualist’s view that the mind is a res cogitans or thinking substance whose nature is wholly
incorporeal, so that it is only contingently related to the body. But it is the Cartesian doctrine of innate
ideas and its implications that Maritain is most interested in.
Friday, March 15, 2024
The metaphysics of individualism
Modern moral
discourse often refers to “persons” and to “individuals” as if the notions were
more or less interchangeable. But that
is not the case. In his book Three Reformers: Luther, Descartes, Rousseau
(especially in chapter 1, section 3), Jacques Maritain notes several important
differences between the concepts, and draws out their moral and social
implications.
Traditionally, in Catholic philosophy, a person is understood to be a substance possessing intellect and will. Intellect and will, in turn, are understood to be immaterial. Hence, to be a person is ipso facto to be incorporeal – wholly so in the case of an angel, partially so in the case of a human being. And qua partially incorporeal, human beings are partially independent of the forces that govern the rest of the material world.
Tuesday, March 5, 2024
When do popes speak ex cathedra?
Consider
four groups that, one might think, couldn’t be more different: Pope Francis’s most
zealous defenders; sedevacantists; Protestants; and Catholics who have recently
left the Church (for Eastern Orthodoxy, say).
Something at least many of them have in common is a serious
misunderstanding of the Catholic doctrine of papal infallibility – one which
has led them to draw fallacious conclusions from recent papal teaching that
seems to conflict with traditional Catholic doctrine (for example, on Holy
Communion for those in invalid marriages, the death penalty, and blessings for
same-sex couples). Some of Pope
Francis’s defenders insist that, since these teachings came from a pope, they must therefore be consistent with traditional
doctrine, appearances notwithstanding.
Sedevacantists argue instead that, given that these teachings are not
consistent with traditional doctrine, Francis must not be a true pope. Some Protestants, meanwhile, argue that since
Francis is a true pope but the teachings in question are (they judge) not
consistent with traditional Christian doctrine, Catholic claims about papal
infallibility have been falsified.
Finally, some Catholics have concluded the same thing, and left the
Church as a result.
Sunday, February 25, 2024
What counts as magisterial teaching?
Popes speak
infallibly when they either proclaim some doctrine ex cathedra, or reiterate some doctrine that has already been
taught infallibly by virtue of being a consistent teaching of the ordinary
magisterium of the Church for millennia.
Even when papal teaching is not infallible, it is normally owed
“religious assent.” However, the Church
recognizes exceptions. The instruction Donum
Veritatis, issued during the pontificate of St. John Paul II,
acknowledges that “it could happen that some Magisterial documents might not be
free from all deficiencies” so that “a theologian may, according to the case,
raise questions regarding the timeliness, the form, or even the contents of
magisterial interventions.” Donum Veritatis explicitly distinguishes
such respectful criticism from “dissent” from perennial Church teaching.
Monday, February 19, 2024
A comment on comments
Dear reader, if it seems your comment has not been approved, sometimes it actually has been approved even if you don’t see it. The reason is that once a combox reaches 200 comments, the Blogger software will not show any new comments made after that unless you click “Load more…” at the bottom of the comments page. The trouble is that this is in small print and easily overlooked. In the screen cap above, I’ve circled in red what you should look for.
Saturday, February 17, 2024
Avicenna, Aquinas, and Leibniz on the argument from contingency
Avicenna,
Aquinas, and Leibniz all present versions of what would today be called the argument from contingency for the
existence of a divine necessary being.
Their versions are interestingly different, despite Aquinas’s having
been deeply influenced by Avicenna and Leibniz’s having been familiar with Aquinas. I think all three of them are good arguments,
though I won’t defend them here. I
discussed Avicenna’s argument in an
earlier post. I defend
Aquinas’s in my book Aquinas,
at pp. 90-99. I defend Leibniz’s in
chapter 5 of my book Five
Proofs of the Existence of God.
Here I merely want to compare and contrast the arguments.
Wednesday, February 7, 2024
The heresy with a thousand faces
In a
new article at Postliberal Order,
I discuss the disturbing parallels between the woke phenomenon and the medieval
Catharist or Albigensian heresy, a movement so fanatical and virulent that the
preaching of the Dominicans could not entirely eliminate it and Church and
state judged military action to be necessary.
Saturday, January 27, 2024
Immortal souls at West Point
Had a great
time visiting the United States Military Academy at West Point this week for a
Thomistic Institute talk on the theme “Do You Have an Immortal Soul?” Thank you
TI and cadets!
Monday, January 22, 2024
Voluntarism in The Vanishing
The
reputation of 1993’s The Vanishing
has suffered because critics judge it inferior to the 1988 Dutch movie of which
it was a remake. But considered on its
own terms, it is a solid enough little thriller. Jeff Bridges is effectively creepy as the
oddball family-man-cum-kidnapper Barney Cousins. I had reason to re-watch the flick the other
day, and was struck by what I take to be an underlying theme of the contrast
between voluntarist and intellectualist conceptions of human
action.
Wednesday, January 17, 2024
Avicenna’s flying man
Peter
Adamson’s new book Ibn
Sīnā (Avicenna): A Very Short Introduction is an excellent
primer on the great medieval Islamic philosopher. After a biographical chapter, it treats
Avicenna’s views on logic and epistemology, philosophical anthropology,
science, and natural theology, and closes with a discussion of his influence on
later philosophy and theology. Among the
things readers will find useful is the book’s discussion of Avicenna’s famous
“flying man” argument. Let’s take a
look.
Wednesday, January 10, 2024
Jesuit Britain?
My review of
the anthology Projections
of Spanish Jesuit Scholasticism on British Thought: New Horizons in Politics,
Law, and Rights, edited by Leopoldo Prieto López and José Luis Cendejas
Bueno, appears in the Winter
2023 issue of Religion and Liberty.
Tuesday, January 2, 2024
New Year’s open thread
Let’s open
the New Year with an open thread. Now’s
the time at last to bring up that otherwise off-topic comment that keeps
getting deleted, or anything else you like.
From Art Nouveau to Art Blakey, from presidents to presentism, from
sci-fi to Wi-Fi to hi-fis, everything is on topic. Just keep it civil and classy. Previous open threads collected here.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)