Prof. John
Finnis is the most eminent living “new natural law” theorist, and a longtime
opponent of capital punishment. Indeed,
like other NNL writers, he regards capital punishment as always and inherently wrong, and believes that the Church could
adopt this novel teaching. You might
think, then, that he would approve of Pope Francis’s recent revision to the
catechism. Not so.
"One of the best contemporary writers on philosophy" National Review
"A terrific writer" Damian Thompson, Daily Telegraph
"Feser... has the rare and enviable gift of making philosophical argument compulsively readable" Sir Anthony Kenny, Times Literary Supplement
Selected for the First Things list of the 50 Best Blogs of 2010 (November 19, 2010)
Friday, August 31, 2018
Tuesday, August 28, 2018
Hubris meets nemesis? (Updated)
UPDATE 8/29: More from the Cupich interview. Has to be seen to be believed.
The pattern is by now familiar. Serious criticisms are leveled by serious people against the pope; the pope ignores them; and his associates and defenders disregard the substance of the criticisms while flinging ad hominem attacks at the critics. This happened during the doctrinal controversies over Amoris Laetitia and capital punishment, and it is happening again in the wake of Archbishop Vigano’s astonishing testimony. The pope refuses to answer the charges against him. The Usual Sycophants try to smear the archbishop and his defenders as disgruntled reactionaries. Among Uncle Ted’s boys, Cardinal Cupich leapt almost immediately for the bottom of the rhetorical barrel: “Quite frankly, they also don’t like [the pope] because he’s a Latino.”
The pattern is by now familiar. Serious criticisms are leveled by serious people against the pope; the pope ignores them; and his associates and defenders disregard the substance of the criticisms while flinging ad hominem attacks at the critics. This happened during the doctrinal controversies over Amoris Laetitia and capital punishment, and it is happening again in the wake of Archbishop Vigano’s astonishing testimony. The pope refuses to answer the charges against him. The Usual Sycophants try to smear the archbishop and his defenders as disgruntled reactionaries. Among Uncle Ted’s boys, Cardinal Cupich leapt almost immediately for the bottom of the rhetorical barrel: “Quite frankly, they also don’t like [the pope] because he’s a Latino.”
Monday, August 20, 2018
The Immateriality of the Mind
At the Society
of Catholic Scientists meeting at Catholic University of America last June,
I gave the keynote address on the topic “Arguments for the Immateriality of the
Mind.” You can now watch the
lecture via YouTube. (For anyone who
is wondering, Prof. Karin Öberg, one of the conference organizers, is the one
you’ll see introducing me.) Some of the
other conference talks can also be seen at the SCS page at
YouTube.
Saturday, August 18, 2018
Review of Pinker’s Enlightenment Now (Updated)
UPDATE: The review has now been unlocked and can be read for free at the CRB website.
My review of Steven Pinker’s Enlightenment Now: The Case for Reason, Science, Humanism, and Progress appears in the Summer 2018 issue of the Claremont Review of Books.
My review of Steven Pinker’s Enlightenment Now: The Case for Reason, Science, Humanism, and Progress appears in the Summer 2018 issue of the Claremont Review of Books.
Wednesday, August 15, 2018
An Open Appeal to the Cardinals of the Church
An
international group of 45 Catholic scholars and clergy has signed an appeal to
the cardinals of the Catholic Church, calling on them to advise Pope Francis to
retract the recent revision made to the Catechism, on the grounds that its
appearance of contradicting scripture and traditional teaching is causing
scandal. The appeal and list of
signatories has
been published today as an open letter at First Things.
As LifeSiteNews is reporting, over 30
further Catholic scholars, clergy, and professionals have also added their
signatures to the appeal. This longer
list can
be viewed there.
Wednesday, August 8, 2018
Three problems with the change to the Catechism (Updated)
UPDATE 8/13: The Stream recently interviewed me about the change to the Catechism.
In a new article at Catholic Herald, I analyze the recent revision to the Catechism in greater detail. I argue that there are three serious problems with it.
In a new article at Catholic Herald, I analyze the recent revision to the Catechism in greater detail. I argue that there are three serious problems with it.
An op-ed on the revision by Joseph Bessette, my co-author on By Man Shall His Blood Be Shed, appears at The Wall Street Journal.
Joe and I were recently interviewed by LifeSiteNews. Today I did a Skype interview on the subject with Michael Knowles at The Daily Wire.
Friday, August 3, 2018
Pope Francis and capital punishment
Pope Francis
has
changed the Catechism’s teaching
on capital punishment so that it now flatly rules out the practice as “inadmissible”
on doctrinal, and not merely prudential, grounds – apparently contradicting two
millennia of clear and consistent teaching to the contrary. I comment on this development in an
article at First Things.
Wednesday, August 1, 2018
Tugwell on St. Albert on negative theology
Negative
theology is a crucial component of classical theism.
To a first approximation, the idea is that at least with respect to
some aspects of the divine nature, we can say what God is not rather than what
he is. But again, that is only a first
approximation, and a potentially misleading one at that. In his long and substantive introduction to
the spiritual theology of St. Albert the Great in Albert and Thomas: Selected Writings, Fr. Simon Tugwell makes some
important observations about the matter.
I want to call attention to four of them.