Yesterday I
appeared on The Michael Medved Show
with Skeptic magazine’s Michael
Shermer. (Unfortunately, the podcast
seems to be behind a
paywall. [Update: A reader kindly calls my attention to this link, where you can listen to the show.]) It was billed as a
“debate,” though I would describe it as more of a friendly discussion. Shermer was very polite and even
complimentary about my book Five Proofs of the Existence of God, which I appreciate.
(Shermer says: "It's a good book... well-argued, well-articulated.") Naturally, he does not agree with
the book, but as every philosopher knows, you can find a book interesting and
worth reading and thinking about even if you don’t agree with it. But as it happens, we did end up agreeing on
a few things, such as the weaknesses in certain pop arguments for God’s
existence.
"One of the best contemporary writers on philosophy" National Review
"A terrific writer" Damian Thompson, Daily Telegraph
"Feser... has the rare and enviable gift of making philosophical argument compulsively readable" Sir Anthony Kenny, Times Literary Supplement
Selected for the First Things list of the 50 Best Blogs of 2010 (November 19, 2010)
Saturday, September 30, 2017
Friday, September 29, 2017
Ward on Scholastic Metaphysics
In the Winter 2017 issue of Pro Ecclesia, Baylor University philosopher Thomas M. Ward kindly
reviews my book Scholastic Metaphysics: A Contemporary Introduction.
From the review:
This accessible, insightful,
entertaining book introduces and defends Scholastic, mostly Thomistic,
metaphysics in dialogue with important figures from contemporary analytic
metaphysics… Feser is blessed with a clear and entertaining prose style, which
makes it all the more enjoyable to engage his philosophical work. I highly recommend this book…
Tuesday, September 26, 2017
This week in radio
Having
recommended my book The
Last Superstition in a recent podcast, in yesterday’s show Ben
Shapiro kindly recommended Five
Proofs of the Existence of God. (His
comments about the book occur about 41 minutes into the show.) Thanks, Ben!
This week I’ll be recording a Skype interview for Ben’s Facebook
Live podcast, which will run next Monday.
This Friday
I will appear on The Michael Medved Show at 1:00 pm
PT to debate Michael Shermer on the subject of atheism versus theism.
Monday, September 25, 2017
Review of Leroi’s The Lagoon
My review of
Armand Marie Leroi’s excellent book The
Lagoon: How Aristotle Invented Science appears in the September
issue of Isis: Journal of the History of Science Society.
The link takes you to just the first page of
the review, but as it happens there are only a few further sentences on the
page that follow it. So when you’re done
reading what you see at the link, come back here for the rest of the review. Here it is:
Friday, September 22, 2017
Thought-free blogs
Perhaps the
most vivid manifestation of the cluelessness of New Atheists is their strange
compulsion to comment at length on books they admit they have not read. Naturally, you see this frequently from
anonymous doofuses in comboxes, Amazon reviews, and the like. But what is really remarkable is how often
even otherwise intelligent and educated people make fools of themselves by
doing exactly what they accuse religious believers of doing – forming an
opinion based on preconceptions rather than the actual evidence. We saw biologist Jerry Coyne do this
a few years ago when
he devoted over 5000 words across two blog posts to harshly criticizing a David
Bentley Hart book he admitted he had not read.
The latest example comes from
theoretical physicist Mano Singham at Freethought
Blogs.
Tuesday, September 19, 2017
Conversations with Klavan et al.
My recent interview on Daily Wire’s The Andrew Klavan Show has now been posted. You can hear the audio at the
Daily Wire website or at Ricochet,
and you can see the video either at the Daily Wire (if you are a subscriber) or
on
Facebook. (Addendum: You can now watch it on YouTube as well.) We talk about The
Last Superstition, mechanism versus teleology, natural law, and Five
Proofs of the Existence of God.
Also now available
online is my recent interview on Bill Martinez Live. The subject is Five Proofs and the segment begins a little over 6 minutes into the
show.
Friday, September 15, 2017
McGinn on mind and space
Thoughts and
experiences seem to lack spatial location.
It makes sense to say of a certain cluster of neurons firing that they
are located several centimeters in from your left ear. But it seems to make no sense to say that
your experience of feeling nervous, or your thought about the Pythagorean Theorem,
is located several centimeters in from your left ear. After all, no one who opened up your skull or
took an X-ray of your head would see the thought or the experience, nor would
either be detectible through any other perceptual means. In his book The Mysterious Flame: Conscious Minds in a Material World, Colin McGinn defends this
commonsense supposition that mental states and processes are not locatable in
space.
Monday, September 11, 2017
Radio activity
Today on
his Daily Wire podcast, Ben
Shapiro kindly recommended my book The
Last Superstition, characterizing it as “really fantastically written”
and “rare for a philosophy book, really readable and lucid.” His comments on the book can be heard about
38 minutes into the show.
Speaking of The Daily Wire, I will be interviewed
this week on The Andrew Klavan
Show.
Last week I
was interviewed on Catholic Answers Live
on the subject of my latest book Five
Proofs of the Existence of God. You
can listen to the show here.
Friday, September 8, 2017
Walter Becker (1950 – 2017)
The Steely
Dan sound is well known to anyone who has heard even one or two of the band’s best
known songs, and founders Donald Fagen and Walter Becker contributed equally to
it. Fagen’s is the voice we associate with that sound. What we
might call the Steely Dan attitude, however, derives in large part from Becker,
who died earlier this week.
Saturday, September 2, 2017
Flew on Hume on miracles
Having
looked recently at David Hume on induction and Hume on causation, let’s take a look at Hume’s famous
treatment of miracles. To be more
precise, let’s take a look at Hume’s argument as it is interpreted by Antony
Flew in his introduction to the Open Court Classics edition of Hume’s essay Of Miracles. This being
Hume, the argument is, shall we say, problematic.