By Man Shall His Blood Be Shed will be out from Ignatius Press next month. Later in the year, and also from Ignatius, comes
my book Five Proofs of the Existence of
God. Having told you, dear reader, a
bit about the former, let me say something about the latter.
"One of the best contemporary writers on philosophy" National Review
"A terrific writer" Damian Thompson, Daily Telegraph
"Feser... has the rare and enviable gift of making philosophical argument compulsively readable" Sir Anthony Kenny, Times Literary Supplement
Selected for the First Things list of the 50 Best Blogs of 2010 (November 19, 2010)
Wednesday, April 26, 2017
Wednesday, April 19, 2017
Empirical science and the transcendentals
As James
Ladyman notes in Understanding Philosophy
of Science, “many scientists intuitively regard simple and unifying
theories as, all other things being equal, more likely to be true than messy
and complex ones” (p. 83). In the minds
of some prominent scientists, this simplicity criterion is tied to aesthetic
value. Einstein is often quoted as saying that “the only physical
theories that we are willing to accept are the beautiful ones.” Paul Dirac went so far as to opine that “it is more important to have beauty
in one’s equations than to have them fit experiment.”
Sunday, April 9, 2017
The problem of Hume’s problem of induction
In the
context of discussion of Hume’s famous “problem of induction,” induction is
typically characterized as reasoning from what we have observed to what we have
not observed. For example, we reason
inductively in this sense when we infer from the fact that bread has nourished
us in the past that it will also nourish us in the future. (There are, of course, other ways to
characterize induction, but we can ignore them for the purposes of this post.)
Sunday, April 2, 2017
Goldman on Dreher’s The Benedict Option
People have
been asking me to comment on David Goldman’s review of Rod Dreher’s The Benedict Option. The reason is that
among Goldman’s criticisms of Dreher (some of which I agree with) are a set of
objections to metaphysical realism, which has its roots in Plato and Aristotle,
was central to the thought of medieval philosophers like Aquinas, and was
abandoned by nominalists like Ockham – an abandonment which prepared the ground
for some of the aspects of modernity Dreher rightly deplores. (I’ve discussed the nature and consequences
of this philosophical shift myself in several places, such as The Last Superstition.)