By
“liberalism” I don’t mean merely what goes under that label in the context of
contemporary U.S. politics. I mean the long
political tradition, tracing back to Hobbes and Locke, from which modern
liberalism grew. By natural inclinations, I don’t mean tendencies that that are merely
deep-seated or habitual. I mean tendencies
that are “natural” in the specific sense operative in
classical natural law theory. And by
natural inclinations, I don’t mean
tendencies that human beings are always conscious of or wish to pursue. I mean the way that a faculty can of its
nature “aim at” or be “directed toward” some end or goal whether or not an
individual realizes it or wants to pursue that end -- teleology or final
causality in the Aristotelian-Thomistic (A-T) sense.
"One of the best contemporary writers on philosophy" National Review
"A terrific writer" Damian Thompson, Daily Telegraph
"Feser... has the rare and enviable gift of making philosophical argument compulsively readable" Sir Anthony Kenny, Times Literary Supplement
Selected for the First Things list of the 50 Best Blogs of 2010 (November 19, 2010)
Thursday, July 28, 2016
Sunday, July 24, 2016
The Last Superstition in Brazil
My book The
Last Superstition, having appeared a few years back in a
German translation, will soon be available in Brazilian Portuguese. The publisher is Edições Cristo Rei, and
the book is being kicked off by way of a crowdfunding
campaign. The book cover can be seen
above. (Yes, that’s me they’ve drawn in
front of the blackboard. You can guess
who the other guys are.)
Monday, July 18, 2016
Capital punishment at Catholic World Report
UPDATE: The second installment of the article has now been posted at CWR.
Over at Catholic World Report today you’ll find “Why the Church Cannot Reverse Past Teaching on Capital Punishment,” the first installment of a two-part article I have co-authored with Joseph M. Bessette, who teaches government and ethics at Claremont McKenna College. Joe and I recently completed work on our book By Man Shall His Blood Be Shed: A Catholic Defense of the Death Penalty, which is forthcoming from Ignatius Press.
Over at Catholic World Report today you’ll find “Why the Church Cannot Reverse Past Teaching on Capital Punishment,” the first installment of a two-part article I have co-authored with Joseph M. Bessette, who teaches government and ethics at Claremont McKenna College. Joe and I recently completed work on our book By Man Shall His Blood Be Shed: A Catholic Defense of the Death Penalty, which is forthcoming from Ignatius Press.
Tuesday, July 12, 2016
Bad lovin’
To love, on
the Aristotelian-Thomistic analysis, is essentially to will the good of another.
Of course, there’s more to be said.
Aquinas elaborates as follows:
As the Philosopher says (Rhet. ii,
4), “to love is to wish good to someone.” Hence the movement of love has a twofold
tendency: towards the good which a man wishes to someone (to himself or to
another) and towards that to which he wishes some good. Accordingly, man has love of concupiscence
towards the good that he wishes to another, and love of friendship towards him
to whom he wishes good.
Thursday, July 7, 2016
I am overworked, therefore I link
Physicist
Lee Smolin and philosopher Roberto Unger think that physics has gotten something really important really wrong. NPR
reports.
The relationship between Aristotelian hylemorphism and quantum mechanics
is the subject of two among a number of recent papers by philosopher Robert
Koons.
Hey, he said he would return. At Real
Clear Defense, Francis Sempa detects a
revival of interest in General Douglas MacArthur. The New
Criterion reviews
Arthur Herman’s new book on MacArthur, while the Wall
Street Journal and Weekly
Standard discuss Walter Borneman’s new book.
At The Catholic Thing, Matthew
Hanley discusses Dario Fernandez-Morera’s
book The
Myth of the Andalusian Paradise: Muslims, Christians, and Jews under Islamic
Rule in Medieval Spain.