Some years
ago, at an initially friendly dinner after a conference, I sat next to a fellow
Catholic academic, to whom I mildly expressed the opinion that it had been a
mistake for Catholic theologians to move away from the arguments of natural
theology that had been so vigorously championed by Neo-Scholastic writers. He responded in something like a paroxysm of
fury, sputtering bromides of the sort familiar from personalist and nouvelle theologie criticisms of
Neo-Scholasticism. Taken aback by this
sudden change in the tone of our conversation, I tried to reassure him that I
was not denying that the approaches he preferred had their place, and reminded
him that belief in the philosophical demonstrability of God’s existence was,
after all, just part of Catholic doctrine.
But it was no use. Nothing I said
in response could mollify him. It was
like he’d seen a ghost he thought had been exorcised long ago, and couldn’t
pull out of the subsequent panic attack.
"One of the best contemporary writers on philosophy" National Review
"A terrific writer" Damian Thompson, Daily Telegraph
"Feser... has the rare and enviable gift of making philosophical argument compulsively readable" Sir Anthony Kenny, Times Literary Supplement
Selected for the First Things list of the 50 Best Blogs of 2010 (November 19, 2010)
Thursday, November 28, 2013
Wednesday, November 20, 2013
Averroism and cloud computing
The Latin
followers of the medieval Islamic philosopher Ibn Rushd or Averroes (1126 - 1198),
such as Siger of Brabant,
famously taught the doctrine of the unity
of the human intellect. The basic
idea is this: The intellect, Averroists (like other
Aristotelians) argue, is immaterial.
But in that case, they conclude (as not all Aristotelians
would), it cannot be regarded as the form of a material body. It is instead a substance entirely separated
from matter. But matter, the
Aristotelian holds, is the principle by which one instance of the form of some
species is distinguished from another.
Hence there is no way in which one human intellect could be
distinguished from another, so that there must be only a single intellect
shared by all human beings.
Saturday, November 16, 2013
FORTHCOMING: Scholastic Metaphysics
I’ve had a
number of book projects in the works for a while, one of which, my edited
volume Aristotle
on Method and Metaphysics, appeared last summer. Next on the schedule is Scholastic Metaphysics: A Contemporary Introduction, which will be out next year from Editiones Scholasticae/Transaction
Publishers. You can read a little about
it here. More information to come.
Wednesday, November 13, 2013
Aquinas’s Fifth Way in Nova et Vetera
My article “Between
Aristotle and William Paley: Aquinas’s Fifth Way” appears in the latest issue (Vol.
11, No. 3) of Nova et Vetera. The article is fairly long and is by far the
most detailed exposition and defense of the Fifth Way I’ve yet given, going
well beyond what I say about it in The
Last Superstition and Aquinas.
Monday, November 11, 2013
Some questions on the soul, Part III
In some recent posts I’ve been answering readers’ questions about the Aristotelian-Thomistic (A-T) understanding of the soul. One more for the road, from a reader who is unclear about why mind-body interaction, which is notoriously problematic for Cartesian dualism, is not also problematic for A-T. The reader writes:
[U]nless something like dualist
interactionism is true, I don't see how… immaterial thoughts and - in
particular - the will - could possibly cause me to do something as simple as
typing this e-mail…
Science would seem to say that the
efficient cause of this was certain electrochemical reactions in my body.
The material cause would be the physical events happening in my body. It
seems that A-T philosophy would hold that the final cause was getting an answer
to a philosophical question, and I agree. My soul would then be the
formal cause, but I guess that notion is incoherent to me… And, unless the
immaterial mind somehow interacts with my body (through quantum physics,
maybe?), I don't see how my thinking about something in my immaterial intellect
could cause my body to do anything.
Sunday, November 10, 2013
Bloggers in arms (Updated)
Back today
from the “Thomas
Aquinas and Philosophical Realism” symposium in NYC. While there I had the great pleasure of meeting
blogger and statistician to the stars Matt
Briggs and blogger and science-fiction scribe Mike Flynn -- names which will be known
to many longtime readers of this blog. The
three of us are pictured above.
Thursday, November 7, 2013
Oerter is a mensch
Physicist
Robert Oerter and I have been having an exchange over James Ross’s argument for
the immateriality of the intellect. In
response to my
most recent post, Oerter has posted a brief comment. Give it a read. I have nothing to say in reply other than
that Oerter is a good, honest, decent guy and that if we’re ever in the same
town I owe him a beer.
Monday, November 4, 2013
Around the web
Was the twentieth-century
Thomist Reginald Garrigou-Lagrange unduly influenced by Leibnizian rationalism,
as followers of Etienne Gilson often allege?
No, argues Steven Long, over
at Thomistica.net. (Be sure to read
the discussion in the comments section as well as the original post.)
The debate
over Thomas Nagel’s Mind and Cosmos
never ends. Raymond Tallis reviews
the book in The New Atlantis, and
Jim Slagle reviews it
for Philosophy in Review.
You’ve read
Sean Howe’s Marvel
Comics: The Untold Story and checked in regularly at its companion blog. Now brace yourself for Blake Bell and Michael
J. Vassallo’s The
Secret History of Marvel Comics, which has a blog of its own. It’s a
look at the seamier, pulp magazine side of the company’s early history.
Sunday, November 3, 2013
Upcoming speaking engagements
This Saturday,
November 9, I’ll be speaking at a symposium on “Thomas Aquinas and
Philosophical Realism” which will be held at the Catholic Center at New York
University. The other speakers are James Brent, Candace
Vogler, J. David Velleman, Thomas Joseph White, John Haldane, and William
Jaworski. More information here.
On Saturday, November 23, I’ll be speaking at a Catholic Apologetics Academy event at the Sacred Heart Retreat House in Alhambra, CA. More details here.
On Saturday, December 7, I’ll be speaking at a colloquium on the theme “New Scholastic Meets Analytic Philosophy” at the Lindenthal-Institut, Cologne, Germany. The other speakers are David Oderberg, Edmund Runggaldier, Erwin Tegtmeier, Stephen Mumford, and Uwe Meixner. More information here.
On Friday, January 31, I’ll be giving the Aquinas Lecture at Ave Maria University in Florida. More information here.
On Saturday, November 23, I’ll be speaking at a Catholic Apologetics Academy event at the Sacred Heart Retreat House in Alhambra, CA. More details here.
On Saturday, December 7, I’ll be speaking at a colloquium on the theme “New Scholastic Meets Analytic Philosophy” at the Lindenthal-Institut, Cologne, Germany. The other speakers are David Oderberg, Edmund Runggaldier, Erwin Tegtmeier, Stephen Mumford, and Uwe Meixner. More information here.
On Friday, January 31, I’ll be giving the Aquinas Lecture at Ave Maria University in Florida. More information here.